European alternatives to Uber Eats
Uber's food-delivery arm, riding the same logistics and location platform. A publicly-traded US company holding order and location data under US jurisdiction.
Company information about Uber Eats
- Company
- Uber Technologies Inc.
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2014
- Data jurisdiction
- United States
- Ownership
- Publicly traded
- GDPR
- No
- Open source
- No
- Infrastructure
- Mixed infrastructure
Why people switch away from Uber Eats
European alternatives to Uber Eats
One of Europe's largest food delivery platforms, founded and headquartered in Amsterdam. After acquiring Grubhub for $7.3B in 2021 and selling it for $650M in January 2025, Just Eat has returned to its European roots. Now operates in 18 countries across Europe, publicly listed on Euronext Amsterdam and the London Stock Exchange.
Berlin-founded meal kit company operating in 18 countries. Delivers pre-portioned fresh ingredients with recipes directly to customers. Founded in 2011, listed on Frankfurt Stock Exchange. €7.5B revenue. German alternative to US food delivery platforms.
Copenhagen-founded B Corp fighting food waste: its app sells shops' and restaurants' unsold food as discounted 'Surprise Bags'. Used across 20+ countries — a Danish European alternative for cheaper meals with less waste.
Finnish food delivery platform founded in Helsinki in 2014. Operates in 27 countries across Europe, Middle East, and Japan. Acquired by US company DoorDash in 2022 for $8.1B but continues to operate independently from Helsinki. 35M+ customers.
Want more options? Browse all European Food delivery alternatives →
DoorDash 
Instacart Start somewhere.
Switching everything overnight is not realistic. Start where it matters most: your email, your cloud storage, your business tools. Replace one thing at a time.
The European Alternative already exists.
Pick Europe.
Why avoid United States-owned services?
CLOUD Act
Forces US companies to hand over data stored anywhere in the world upon government request, including data on European servers.
FISA Section 702
Authorises mass surveillance of non-US persons using data held by US tech platforms, without a warrant or notification.
GDPR vs US law conflict
EU courts have repeatedly found that US surveillance law conflicts with European fundamental rights. Schrems I and II both invalidated EU-US data transfer agreements.