European alternatives to Netlify
A developer platform for building and hosting modern web front-ends. A venture-backed US company on AWS, so hosting jurisdiction is US by default.
Company information about Netlify
- Company
- Netlify, Inc.
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2014
- Data jurisdiction
- United States
- Ownership
- VC-backed
- GDPR
- No
- Open source
- No
- Infrastructure
- Amazon AWS
Why people switch away from Netlify
European alternatives to Netlify
Family-owned German cloud and dedicated server provider founded in 1997. Own data centres in Germany and Finland, no outside investors, no VC pressure, delivering reliable European infrastructure at unbeatable prices.
Slovenian content delivery network and cloud storage provider founded in 2017. Operates 120+ PoPs worldwide with European ownership and no ties to US Big Tech. Simple pricing, no hidden fees, GDPR-compliant infrastructure.
France's largest cloud provider with 43 data centres across Europe and beyond. Family-founded in 1999, publicly listed, with a strong focus on data sovereignty and competitive pricing.
Lithuanian web hosting giant serving 29 million users in 178 countries. Affordable shared, VPS and cloud hosting with a custom control panel and strong European infrastructure.
Want more options? Browse all European Hosting & cloud infrastructure alternatives →
People also replace
Heroku 
Vercel 
Amazon Web Services 
DigitalOcean 
Linode 
Alibaba Cloud Start somewhere.
Switching everything overnight is not realistic. Start where it matters most: your email, your cloud storage, your business tools. Replace one thing at a time.
The European Alternative already exists.
Pick Europe.
Why avoid United States-owned services?
CLOUD Act
Forces US companies to hand over data stored anywhere in the world upon government request, including data on European servers.
FISA Section 702
Authorises mass surveillance of non-US persons using data held by US tech platforms, without a warrant or notification.
GDPR vs US law conflict
EU courts have repeatedly found that US surveillance law conflicts with European fundamental rights. Schrems I and II both invalidated EU-US data transfer agreements.