European alternatives to Discord

A voice-and-text platform born in gaming that's become a home for communities of every kind. It's a venture-backed US company on Google Cloud, with no end-to-end encryption for text and a lot of data on who talks to whom.

Company information about Discord
Company
Discord Inc.
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
2015
Data jurisdiction
United States
Ownership
VC-backed
GDPR
No
Open source
No
Infrastructure
Google Cloud

Why people switch away from Discord

Subject to US CLOUD ActProprietary softwareRuns on Big Tech infrastructureNot covered by GDPR

European alternatives to Discord

1
Top Pick

Sweden 100 · Certified European

Fluxer is open-source chat, voice and video software from Sweden, built as an alternative to Discord. It began as one student's project and now has a small team. Self-hosting unlocks every premium feature for free.

Freemium · from Free Free tier Open source Bootstrapped Own infrastructure EU
2

Germany 86 · Strongly European

German all-in-one collaboration platform combining team chat, project management, video conferencing, and document editing. All data stored exclusively in Germany with end-to-end encryption. ISO 27001 certified. Used by 10,000+ companies.

Freemium · from Free Free tier Own infrastructure EU
3

United Kingdom 75 · Strongly European

European secure communications platform built on the open Matrix protocol. Used by NATO, the EU, French and German governments, and 47M+ users across 80,000+ deployments. Self-hostable with full end-to-end encryption.

Open-core · from Free Free tier Open source Own infrastructure European

Want more options? Browse all European Messaging & chat alternatives →

Start somewhere.

Switching everything overnight is not realistic. Start where it matters most: your email, your cloud storage, your business tools. Replace one thing at a time.

The European Alternative already exists.
Pick Europe.

Why avoid United States-owned services?

CLOUD Act

Forces US companies to hand over data stored anywhere in the world upon government request, including data on European servers.

FISA Section 702

Authorises mass surveillance of non-US persons using data held by US tech platforms, without a warrant or notification.

GDPR vs US law conflict

EU courts have repeatedly found that US surveillance law conflicts with European fundamental rights. Schrems I and II both invalidated EU-US data transfer agreements.

Here are alternatives for services from United States →